---
oa_review_kit: v1
guide_slug: us-fbar-fatca-reporting
guide_version: us-fbar-fatca-reporting@2026-05-31T18:20:06.790Z
archetype: other
---

# Review kit: US Fbar FATCA Reporting

Thank you for reviewing this Guide. This kit is one file with three parts: how
to use it, an interview prompt for your AI, and the Guide itself.

## How to use this kit (3 steps, about 15 minutes)

1. Open the AI you already use (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, anything that reads
   markdown) and paste in everything from "INTERVIEW PROMPT" below, including
   the Guide at the end.
2. Your AI interviews you like a colleague, one question at a time. Just talk:
   war stories, walk-throughs, the mistakes you catch. No writing required.
3. Your AI writes your answers up as a single markdown file. Hand it back at
   openaccountants.com/skills/us-fbar-fatca-reporting/handback (also linked from the Guide
   page: "Hand back your file"). What you added is published under your name
   and credential.

If your AI cannot produce the exact output format, hand back whatever you have:
a revised Guide file, a worksheet, or plain notes. We take those too, and a
person reviews them by hand. The format below is the one we can apply straight
away.

---

# INTERVIEW PROMPT (paste from here down into your AI)

You are interviewing a practising accountant about how they actually do the
work covered by the attached Guide ("US Fbar FATCA Reporting", slug `us-fbar-fatca-reporting`).
Interview them like a colleague doing a handover. Do not lecture. Ask ONE
question at a time and wait for the answer. Chase war stories and specifics:
what kind of client, which portal step, how big the penalty was.

The rates, thresholds, and citations are our job; we refresh those from primary
sources. Capture ONLY what is NOT derivable from law:

- order of operations, and what a wrong order corrupts
- what to ask a client before computing anything
- what to assume when a fact is unknown, and how it gets flagged
- the most-missed traps, with penalty size and who falls in
- how the portal or filing channel actually behaves
- what has to reconcile before anyone signs
- when to refuse the work and hand it to a human specialist

If the accountant corrects a rate, threshold, or deadline in the Guide along
the way, record it in the FACT CORRECTIONS table, but do not steer the
interview toward numbers.

## Questions to work through

Ask these in order, one at a time. Skip any the accountant has already covered;
follow up where a story has specifics worth pinning down. Each question is
tagged with the method slot(s) it feeds.

1. [sequence] Walk me through the last one of these you did for a real client, start to finish. What did you open first, and why that order?
2. [intake_questions] A new client sits down for this work. What are your first five questions before you touch a number?
3. [evidence] Which documents do you insist on seeing, and which do you take the client's word for?
4. [trap] When you review this work drafted by someone else, what mistake do you catch most often?
5. [conservative_default] When a key fact is unknowable at draft time, what do you assume, and how do you flag it?
6. [judgment_rule] When the law allows two routes, how do you actually pick, and what do you write down about the choice?
7. [cross_check] Before you sign, what has to reconcile with what, and how close is close enough?
8. [filing_mechanics] Walk me through the actual submission: the portal steps, the order things must happen in, what locks, what you can't undo.
9. [scope_gate] Which clients do you refuse or refer to a specialist for this work? What makes you stop?
10. [unsettled_law] Anything here you deliberately won't finalise right now because the rules are moving?
11. [handback_protocol] What exactly do you hand over at the end? What's in your working paper?

## Method slots (for tagging the write-up)

- `scope_gate` (Scope gate and refusals): when to stop and send the client to a human
- `sequence` (Order of operations): what order to do things in, and what a wrong order corrupts
- `intake_questions` (Client intake questions): what to ask a client before computing
- `evidence` (Documents and evidence): which documents to insist on, and what is draft-grade vs file-grade
- `judgment_rule` (Judgment rules): how a practitioner actually picks when the law allows two routes
- `conservative_default` (Conservative defaults): what to assume when a fact is unknowable at draft time
- `trap` (Traps and most-missed items): the mistakes everyone makes, what they cost, and who falls in
- `filing_mechanics` (Portal and filing mechanics): how submission actually works: channel, order, what locks
- `cross_check` (Cross-checks before signing): what has to reconcile with what before delivery, and how close is close enough
- `pattern_library` (Pattern library): how messy real-world data (bank lines, payout platforms) maps to tax categories
- `edge_case` (Edge-case playbook): the client situations that change the method, not just the numbers
- `unsettled_law` (Unsettled-law flags): what not to finalise right now, and why
- `handback_protocol` (Hand-back protocol): what the finished working paper contains and who reviews it

## Output format: oa-handback v1

When the interview is done, write the answers up as ONE markdown file in
exactly this shape. Fill in the reviewer's real name, credential, and email
(ask for them at the end if they have not come up). Every method block gets a
`### [method:<slot>]` heading where `<slot>` is one of the 13 slot ids
above. Keep `guide_slug` and `guide_version` exactly as given. Omit any
section the interview produced nothing for, but keep the headings that remain
exactly as shown. The `fact_key` column may be left blank when unknown.

```markdown
---
oa_handback: v1
guide_slug: us-fbar-fatca-reporting
guide_version: us-fbar-fatca-reporting@2026-05-31T18:20:06.790Z
reviewer_name: <full name>
reviewer_credential: <credential>        # free text: CPA, EA, ACCA, Steuerberater...
reviewer_email: <email>
verdict: <approve | corrections | unable>
---

## METHOD

### [method:filing_mechanics] <short title for this block>
<prose: the method block, written in second person, imperative>

### [method:intake_questions] <short title for this block>
- <question 1>
- ...

## FACT CORRECTIONS
| fact_key | current | correct | source |
|---|---|---|---|
| <fact key if known, else blank> | <value in the Guide> | <correct value> | <cite> |

## FLAGS
- [unsettled] <what not to finalise, and why>
- [refer] <situations to escalate to a human>

## NOTES
<anything that did not fit a method slot or a fact correction>
```

If for any reason you cannot produce this exact format, output the accountant's
corrections and methods as clear plain notes instead. The hand-back page
accepts plain notes and revised Guide files too; this format is an
optimization, never a gate.

---

# THE GUIDE UNDER REVIEW

<!-- guide: us-fbar-fatca-reporting · version: us-fbar-fatca-reporting@2026-05-31T18:20:06.790Z -->

---
name: us-fbar-fatca-reporting
description: "US foreign-account and foreign-asset reporting for US persons: the FBAR (FinCEN Form 114) and FATCA (Form 8938, IRC §6038D). Covers the $10,000 FBAR aggregate threshold, the higher Form 8938 thresholds, who must file, what each regime counts, deadlines, the willful/non-willful penalty regime, and the streamlined and delinquent-FBAR remediation paths. Produces a working paper and a reviewer brief — not a filed return. MUST load alongside cross-border-tax-workflow-base."
jurisdiction: US
domain: cross-border
tax_year: 2025
---

# us-fbar-fatca-reporting

## US Foreign-Account Reporting — FBAR & FATCA v0.1

## What this file is

This is a **topic content skill**. It loads on top of `cross-border-tax-workflow-base` and assumes the cross-border router has already run, identified the taxpayer as a **US person**, and confirmed the presence of foreign financial accounts and/or foreign assets. It does not re-derive residency or US-person status; consume those from the router's working paper.

It produces a **working paper** and a **reviewer brief** describing which reporting regimes are triggered and why. It is **not** advice, **not** a filed FBAR, and **not** a filed return. A licensed accountant signs off before anything is filed.

Two distinct regimes are in scope, governed by different bodies of law and filed in different places. They overlap but **neither satisfies the other**:

- **FBAR** — FinCEN Form 114, filed electronically with **FinCEN** (the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network) through the BSA E-Filing System, **not** the IRS and **not** attached to the Form 1040. Statutory basis: Bank Secrecy Act, **31 USC §5314**; regulation **31 CFR 1010.350**.
- **FATCA** — **Form 8938**, *Statement of Specified Foreign Financial Assets*, filed **with the Form 1040** under **IRC §6038D**.

## Layer A — Reference layer (decision trees)

Each rule cites the form or statute that controls it. When a threshold figure is involved, **confirm the current-year figure against the live IRS/FinCEN instructions before relying on it** — do not treat any number below as authoritative for the filing year.

### A1. Is the taxpayer a "US person"? (gate for both regimes)

- **US person definition / gate condition** — A US person includes US citizens, US resident aliens (green-card or substantial-presence), and certain US entities/trusts/estates. If the router has not confirmed US-person status, stop and resolve that first — neither regime applies to a non-US person.  _(31 CFR 1010.350(b) for FBAR; IRC §6038D and 8938 instructions for FATCA)_

### A2. FBAR decision tree (31 USC §5314 / 31 CFR 1010.350)

- **FBAR trigger — financial interest or signature authority** — Does the US person have a financial interest in OR signature authority over one or more foreign financial accounts? (Bank, securities, brokerage, certain foreign-issued insurance/annuity with cash value, certain foreign mutual funds.) No → FBAR not required on those facts. Yes → continue.  _(31 USC §5314 / 31 CFR 1010.350)_
- **FBAR aggregate threshold** — US$10,000 USD (Aggregate maximum value of all foreign financial accounts exceeding this at any point during the calendar year triggers FBAR. This is an aggregate-across-all-accounts test, evaluated at the highest balance each account reached during the year — NOT a per-account test. Five accounts of $3,000 each trip the threshold even though no single account exceeds $10,000. No → FBAR not required. Yes → FBAR required (FinCEN Form 114), reporting every qualifying account, including signature-authority-only accounts.)  _(31 USC §5314 / 31 CFR 1010.350)_
- **FBAR deadline** — April 15, with an automatic extension to October 15 (no separate extension request needed for the FBAR).  _(31 USC §5314 / 31 CFR 1010.350)_

### A3. FATCA / Form 8938 decision tree (IRC §6038D)

- **SFFA trigger** — Does the US person hold specified foreign financial assets (SFFAs)? SFFAs are broader than FBAR-reportable accounts — they include foreign financial accounts plus foreign stock or securities held outside an account, interests in foreign entities, and foreign financial instruments held for investment. No → Form 8938 not required. Yes → continue.  _(IRC §6038D)_
- **Form 8938 threshold — living abroad, single/MFS** — > $200,000 on the last day of the year or > $300,000 at any time during the year USD (Illustrative (living abroad) — confirm exact current-year figures)  _(IRC §6038D)_
- **Form 8938 threshold — living abroad, married-filing-jointly** — > $400,000 last day or > $600,000 any time USD (Illustrative (living abroad) — confirm exact current-year figures)  _(IRC §6038D)_
- **US-resident thresholds lower than abroad thresholds** — US-resident thresholds are lower than the abroad thresholds. Do not hardcode — pull the exact figures from the current Form 8938 instructions. Below threshold → Form 8938 not required. At/above threshold → Form 8938 required, filed with the 1040.  _(IRC §6038D)_
- **Form 8938 deadline** — With the income tax return, including extensions (Form 8938 follows the 1040 due date, unlike the standalone FBAR deadline).  _(IRC §6038D)_

### A4. Overlap rule

- **Overlap between FBAR and Form 8938** — Many assets — e.g. a foreign brokerage account — are reportable on both FBAR and Form 8938. Filing one does not discharge the obligation to file the other. Map each asset to both regimes independently.  _(31 USC §5314 / 31 CFR 1010.350; IRC §6038D)_

## Layer B — Executable layer

**Input:** a list of foreign accounts/assets, each with: type, institution, country, financial-interest vs signature-authority, max balance during year (in account currency), year-end balance, and the USD-converted equivalents.

0. **Step 1: Normalize to USD** — Convert each account's maximum balance and year-end balance to USD using the Treasury year-end exchange rate (or a documented published rate). Record the rate and source in the working paper.
0. **Step 2: FBAR test** — Sum the maximum USD balances across all foreign financial accounts (financial interest + signature authority). If aggregate > $10,000 → flag FBAR required; list every qualifying account, marking signature-authority-only ones.
0. **Step 3: FATCA test** — Identify which holdings are SFFAs (superset of FBAR accounts — add foreign stock/securities held outside an account, foreign-entity interests). Determine the taxpayer's filing status and abroad vs US residency from the router output. Look up the current-year Form 8938 threshold pair (last-day / any-time) for that status+residency. Do not rely on the illustrative numbers in A3 — confirm them. Apply both the last-day test (year-end aggregate) and the any-time test (peak aggregate). Tripping either triggers Form 8938.
0. **Step 4: Deadlines** — Set FBAR to Oct 15 (auto-extended) and Form 8938 to the 1040 due date including extensions.
0. **Step 5: Output the reviewer brief** — Output the reviewer brief: which forms are required, which thresholds were tripped and by how much, the list of accounts/assets mapped to each regime (noting the overlap), FX rates used, and any open items requiring counsel (willfulness, pension treatment, signature-authority edge cases).

- **Below-threshold documentation and conservative posture** — If the taxpayer is below all thresholds, still document the test and the margin — near-threshold cases should be re-checked, and conservative posture is: when genuinely unsure whether an item counts or whether a threshold is tripped, file.  _(31 USC §5314 / 31 CFR 1010.350; IRC §6038D)_

## Comparison table — FBAR vs Form 8938

**Comparison table — FBAR vs Form 8938**  _(31 USC §5314 / 31 CFR 1010.350; IRC §6038D)_

| Dimension | FBAR (FinCEN Form 114) | FATCA (Form 8938) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Legal basis | Bank Secrecy Act, 31 USC §5314 / 31 CFR 1010.350 | IRC §6038D |
| Where filed | FinCEN, via BSA E-Filing (separate from the return) | Attached **to the Form 1040** |
| Who files | US persons with financial interest **or signature authority** | US persons holding specified foreign financial assets |
| Threshold | Aggregate **> $10,000** at **any time** (all accounts) | Higher, varies by **filing status** and **abroad vs US** (confirm current-year figures) |
| What counts | Foreign **financial accounts** | **SFFAs** — broader: accounts **plus** foreign stock/securities held outside an account, foreign-entity interests |
| Test type | **Aggregate**, not per-account; peak balance | Last-day **and** any-time aggregate of SFFAs |
| Deadline | **Apr 15**, auto-extended to **Oct 15** | With the 1040, **including extensions** |
| Penalty regime | Non-willful vs willful (see below); civil + potential criminal | §6038D penalties (e.g., failure-to-file + continuation; understatement penalties) |

## Penalties (FBAR)

- **Non-willful FBAR penalty — per-report basis** — A civil penalty applies per failure. Per Bittner v. United States, 598 U.S. 250 (2023), the non-willful penalty is assessed per-report (per annual FBAR form), not per-account — a single late FBAR listing many accounts is one non-willful violation, not one per account.  _(Bittner v. United States, 598 U.S. 250 (2023))_
- **Willful FBAR penalty** — Materially higher — up to the greater of $100,000 or 50% of the account balance, assessed per violation, plus potential criminal exposure.  _(31 USC §5314 / 31 CFR 1010.350)_
- **Willfulness determination requires counsel** — Whether conduct is willful or non-willful is a legal determination requiring counsel; do not characterize it in the working paper beyond flagging it as an open item.  _(31 USC §5314 / 31 CFR 1010.350)_

## Remediation paths (non-willful past non-compliance)

For a US person who failed to file in prior years, the standard paths for non-willful conduct are:

- **Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures** — **Streamlined Foreign Offshore** (taxpayer meets a non-residency / abroad test) or **Streamlined Domestic Offshore** (US-resident). Requires amended/delinquent returns, delinquent FBARs, and a non-willful certification.
- **Delinquent FBAR Submission Procedures** — where the income was reported and tax paid but FBARs were simply not filed; file the delinquent FBARs with a reasonable-cause statement.

Describe these at a high level only. Path selection turns on a willfulness analysis, which requires professional/legal judgement and frequently counsel. Do not certify non-willfulness or recommend a streamlined submission without that review.

## ⚑ AUDIT FLASH POINT — Willfulness

Never label conduct willful or non-willful in the working paper. It drives both penalty exposure and remediation-path eligibility and is a legal call for counsel. Flag it as an open item; do not resolve it.

## ⚑ AUDIT FLASH POINT — Signature-authority-only accounts

Accounts the taxpayer can direct but does not own (employer accounts, accounts they manage for others) are FBAR-reportable even with no financial interest. Easy to miss; capture them.

## ⚑ AUDIT FLASH POINT — Foreign pensions

Whether a foreign pension or retirement plan is FBAR- and/or 8938-reportable depends on the plan's structure (account-style vs entity interest) and any treaty position. Do not assume it is exempt; flag for review.

## ⚑ AUDIT FLASH POINT — Aggregate-not-per-account trap

The $10,000 FBAR threshold is tested on the sum of peak balances across all accounts. Multiple small accounts can trip it even when none individually exceeds $10,000. Never test accounts in isolation.

## ⚑ AUDIT FLASH POINT — Assets reportable on both forms

Reporting a foreign account on the FBAR does not satisfy Form 8938, and vice versa. Map every asset to both regimes independently; the overlap is intentional, not redundant.

## Topic self-checks

- [ ] US-person status confirmed from the router output before applying either regime.
- [ ] All foreign accounts normalized to USD with documented FX rate and source.
- [ ] FBAR tested on **aggregate peak** balances, not per-account.
- [ ] Signature-authority-only accounts identified and included in the FBAR set.
- [ ] SFFA list built as a **superset** of FBAR accounts (added stock/securities held outside an account and foreign-entity interests).
- [ ] Form 8938 thresholds pulled from **current-year** instructions for the correct filing status and abroad/US residency — not the illustrative figures here.
- [ ] Both the last-day and any-time Form 8938 tests applied.
- [ ] Overlap noted: assets on both forms mapped independently; one does not satisfy the other.
- [ ] Deadlines set: FBAR Oct 15 (auto-extended); Form 8938 with the 1040 incl. extensions.
- [ ] Willfulness and remediation-path selection flagged as open items for counsel — not resolved.
- [ ] Conservative posture applied: where genuinely unsure, the item is flagged to file.
- [ ] Output is a working paper + reviewer brief; no claim of human sign-off.

## Disclaimer

Provides computational and interpretive guidance on FBAR and FATCA reporting only. Not tax or legal advice and not a filed return. Willfulness and remediation-path selection require professional/legal judgement. Have outputs reviewed and signed by a qualified, licensed accountant before acting. Research-verified (tier 2) pending credentialed sign-off.
